✕ Quick exit
Stories wanted: old or new, every story counts.Protect yourself →
CNY Therapy ConcernsFamily court accountability

Family law attorneys · Onondaga · Oswego · Madison

Did your attorney work with Karrie Damm-Stewart?

We have the names of attorneys who have worked with Karrie Damm-Stewart. We cannot list them on this website.

Why this matters

We have the names of attorneys who have worked with Karrie Damm-Stewart. We cannot list them on this website.

One attorney used Karrie Damm-Stewart and then represented a family who fought her.

If you are hiring a family law attorney, or already have one, you have the right to ask about their prior work with any evaluator or therapist involved in your case. New York’s Rules of Professional Conduct address conflicts of interest. The rules are quoted in full below.

Questions to ask your attorney

  1. Have you ever retained Karrie Damm-Stewart, or worked on a case where she was the evaluator or therapist?
  2. Have you represented a party on the other side of a case where she was involved?
  3. Is there anything about your prior work that I should know before you represent me? Will you put that in writing?
  4. If she is proposed in my case, will you object? How will you challenge her findings?

22 NYCRR Part 1200

New York Rules of Professional Conduct on conflicts of interest

Rule 1.7 · Conflict of Interest: Current Clients

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if a reasonable lawyer would conclude that either:

(1) the representation will involve the lawyer in representing differing interests; or

(2) there is a significant risk that the lawyer's professional judgment on behalf of a client will be adversely affected by the lawyer's own financial, business, property or other personal interests.

(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if:

(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;

(2) the representation is not prohibited by law;

(3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and

(4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.

Source: 22 NYCRR 1200.0, Rule 1.7 (Cornell Legal Information Institute)

Rule 1.9 · Duties to Former Clients

(a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.

(b) Unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing, a lawyer shall not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in which a firm with which the lawyer formerly was associated had previously represented a client:

(1) whose interests are materially adverse to that person; and

(2) about whom the lawyer had acquired information protected by Rules 1.6 or paragraph (c) of this Rule that is material to the matter.

(c) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter or whose present or former firm has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter:

(1) use confidential information of the former client protected by Rule 1.6 to the disadvantage of the former client, except as these Rules would permit or require with respect to a current client or when the information has become generally known; or

(2) reveal confidential information of the former client protected by Rule 1.6 except as these Rules would permit or require with respect to a current client.

Source: 22 NYCRR 1200.0, Rule 1.9 (Cornell Legal Information Institute)

Rule 1.10(a) · Imputation of Conflicts of Interest

(a) While lawyers are associated in a firm, none of them shall knowingly represent a client when any one of them practicing alone would be prohibited from doing so by Rule 1.7, 1.8 or 1.9, except as otherwise provided therein, unless:

(1) the prohibition is based on a lawyer's own financial, business, property or other personal interests within the meaning of Rule 1.7(a)(2); and

(2) under the circumstances, a reasonable lawyer would conclude that there is no significant risk that the representation will be materially limited or that the independent professional judgment of the participating lawyers in the firm will be adversely affected.

Source: 22 NYCRR 1200.0, Rule 1.10 (Cornell Legal Information Institute) · Official text: NY Courts, Part 1200 (PDF)

Did your attorney, or the other side’s, hire her?

Tell us. The names you share stay private.

Share your story